A Plea to the Fire Service: No third time

We all want to prevent another loss of firefighters like the 19 young men killed during the Yarnell Fire in Arizona. And like the 5 killed during the 2006 Esperanza Fire.
How?
Change the objective.
Protect lives (including firefighters) and property rather than attempt to stop wildfires in the backcountry. The two are often mutually exclusive.

Spending millions of dollars engaging in battlefield-like tactics against an uncontrollable force and attempting to modify the natural environment miles from developments is not working. Instead, we need to create communities that are firesafe through zoning, fire resistant construction and retrofits, appropriate defensible space, and strategic fuel breaks (within 1,000 feet of homes) in conjunction with firefighter safety zones. For those communities in indefensible locations, evacuate the residents and then focus firefighting resources on communities that are defensible.

Esperanza House prior IIThe Esperanza house (lower left), an isolated structure in the backcountry on a hilltop above a steep canyon. Indefensible. Five firefighters were killed defending it in 2006. A statement made at the time: It was a “freak area ignition.”

Fatality site detailed II

The Yarnell Fire fatality site, on the edge of a rural subdivision and near an isolated home in the backcountry. The 19 firefighters were killed in a small bowl area surrounded by rocky hills. A statement made at the time: “It was erratic… a freak of nature.”

No one wants a number three.

Fighting wildland fire and saving lives and property are not the same thing.

“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
– Albert Einstein

Arizona fire deaths prove no one should die for a house
By Crystal A Kolden
For the Washington Post

“Wildfires are not preventable. Like earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes, they are inevitable. Unless we fundamentally change the way we view wildfires, brave men and women will continue to put themselves in harm’s way to protect our homes. And we will have to explain to the families and loved ones of those lost why we thought our houses were more important than their lives.”

For additional information on the best way to protect communities from wildland fire, please see the Chaparral Institute’s page on Protecting Your Home.

One Comment on “A Plea to the Fire Service: No third time

  1. I have a sad sick feeling that this year your role in Chaparral News is going to be Fire Incident Update Reporter. Great article and I agree, there is no home worth someone’s life. People should live with their decision for building a dream home in a dangerous geographical landscape scenario.

    BTW, you and Dylan should get back up to the San Felipe Rd and photograph that asinine example of view lot construction or destruction. Behind that SD Co Sheriff sub-station. and post it on your site as an example of what not to do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: